Friday, June 10, 2011

CT screening for lung cancer: How effective is it in reducing mortality?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21656748

Cancer. 2011 Jun 15;117(12):2703-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25847. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
Modeling the mortality reduction due to computed tomography screening for lung cancer.
Foy M, Yip R, Chen X, Kimmel M, Gorlova OY, Henschke CI.
Source
Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. millennia.foy@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The efficacy of computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer remains controversial because results from the National Lung Screening Trial are not yet available. In this study, the authors used data from a single-arm CT screening trial to estimate the mortality reduction using a modeling-based approach to construct a control comparison arm.

METHODS:
To estimate the potential lung cancer mortality reduction because of CT screening, a previously developed and validated model was applied to the screening trial to predict the number of lung cancer deaths in the absence of screening. By using age, gender, and smoking characteristics matching those of the trial participants, the model was used to simulate 5000 trials in the absence of CT screening to produce the expected number of lung cancer deaths along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), while adjusting for healthy volunteer bias.

RESULTS:
There were 64 observed lung cancer deaths in the screening cohort (n = 7995), whereas the model predicted 117.7 deaths (95% CI, 98 deaths-139 deaths), indicating a mortality reduction of 45.6% (P < .001). When a more conservative healthy volunteer adjustment was applied, 111.3 lung cancer deaths were predicted (95% CI, 91 deaths-132 deaths), for a lung cancer-specific mortality reduction of 42.5% (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:
The results of the current study indicate that CT screening along with early stage treatment can reduce lung cancer-specific mortality. This mortality reduction is greatly influenced by the protocol of nodule follow-up and treatment, and the length of follow-up. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

No comments:

Post a Comment