Thursday, April 25, 2013

From Bryan Liang, Tim Mackey, and Kim Lovett: Suspect online sellers and contraceptive access

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22633248


 2012 Nov;86(5):551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 26.

Suspect online sellers and contraceptive access.

Source

Institute of Health Law Studies, California Western School of Law, San Diego, CA 92101, USA. baliang@alum.mit.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Issues surrounding contraception access have been a national focus. During this debate, adolescent and adult women may seek these products online. Due to safety concerns, including potential counterfeit forms, we wished to assess whether online "no prescription" contraceptives were available.

STUDY DESIGN:

We assessed online availability of reversible, prescription contraceptive methods resulting in <10 undesired pregnancies/year, i.e., Depo-Provera shot; oral contraceptives; NuvaRing; Ortho Evra patch; Paragard and Mirena IUDs; and Implanon/Nexplanon implants. Using Google search "buy ITEM no prescription," we reviewed the first five result pages for "no prescription" vendors. Searches were conducted 1/3/2012-2/20/2012.

RESULTS:

All contraceptives were available as "no prescription" products. Furthermore, IUDs were advertised as "over-the-counter" and YouTube videos provided "how to" videos, including a cartoon version. We also found that illicit online pharmacy marketing is shifting from direct search engine access to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Slidehare, flickr).

CONCLUSION:

Online contraceptive sales represent patient safety risks and a parallel system of high-risk product access absent professional guidance. Providers should educate patients, while policy makers employ legal strategies to address these systemic risks.

No comments:

Post a Comment