Tuesday, August 26, 2014

"...nations may be able to improve the subjective quality of life of people without increasing material wealth or natural resource consumption by increasing gender equality in politics and changing public spending priorities."

Soc Sci Res. 2014 Nov;48:48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 15.

Life satisfaction across nations: The effects of women's political status and public priorities.

Author information

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1291, United States. Electronic address: rfyork@uoregon.edu.
  • 2Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, United States. Electronic address: shannon.eliz.bell@uky.edu.

Abstract

Feminist scholars suggest that improving the quality of life of individuals living in nations around the world may be more readily achieved by increasing women's political power and by reorienting public-policy priorities, than by focusing primarily on economic growth. These considerations raise the question of which characteristics of societies are associated with the quality of life of the people in those societies. Here, we address this issue empirically by statistically analyzing cross-national data. We assess the effects of gender equality in the political sphere, as well as a variety of other factors, on the subjective well-being of nations, as indicated by average self-reported levels of life satisfaction. We find that people report the highest levels of life satisfaction in nations where women have greater political representation, where military spending is low, and where health care spending is high, controlling for a variety of other factors. GDP per capita, urbanization, and natural resource exploitation are not clearly associated with life satisfaction. These findings suggest that nations may be able to improve the subjective quality of life of people without increasing material wealth or natural resource consumption by increasing gender equality in politics and changing public spending priorities.

No comments:

Post a Comment