Friday, May 1, 2015

The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3

 2015 Mar;6:1-11.

The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3.

Author information

  • 1Department of Health Administration, School of Allied Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University. mccue@vcu.edu

Abstract

For the past three years, the Affordable Care Act has required health insurers to pay out a minimum percentage of premiums in medical claims or quality improvement expenses--known as a medical loss ratio (MLR). Insurers with MLRs below the minimum must rebate the difference to consumers. This issue brief finds that total rebates for 2013 were $325 million, less than one-third the amount paid out in 2011, indicating much greater compliance with the MLR rule. Insurers' spending on quality improvement remained low, at less than 1 percent of premiums. Insurers' administrative and sales costs, such as brokers' fees, and profit margins have reduced slightly but remain fairly steady. In the first three years under this regulation, total consumer benefits related to the medical loss ratio--both rebates and reduced overhead--amounted to over $5 billion. This was achieved without a great exodus of insurers from the market.

No comments:

Post a Comment