Monday, July 9, 2012

From Memorial Sloan-Kettering: SUVmax and pleural diffuse malignant mesothelioma

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22617244


 2012 Jul;7(7):1192-1197.

High SUVmax on FDG-PET Indicates Pleomorphic Subtype in Epithelioid Malignant PleuralMesothelioma: Supportive Evidence to Reclassify Pleomorphic as Nonepithelioid Histology.

Source

*Division of Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; †Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan; ‡Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; §Division of Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; ║Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and ¶Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

We have recently proposed to reclassify the pleomorphic subtype of epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) as nonepithelioid (biphasic/sarcomatoid) histology because of its similarly poor prognosis. We sought to investigate whether preoperative maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) correlates with histologic subtype in MPM.

METHODS:

Clinical data were collected for 78 patients with MPM who underwent preoperative FDG-PET. We retrospectively classified the epithelioid tumors into five subtypes: trabecular, tubulopapillary, micropapillary, solid, and pleomorphic. Tumors were categorized by SUVmax into two groups: low (<10.0) and high (≥10.0).

RESULTS:

The median overall survival of epithelioid tumors with high SUVmax (n = 12) was significantly shorter (7.1 months) than that of epithelioid tumors with low SUVmax (n = 54, 18.9 months, p < 0.001) and comparable to nonepithelioid tumors (n = 12, 7.2 months). Epithelioid tumors with pleomorphic subtype (n = 9) had marginally higher SUVmax (mean ± SD: 10.6 ± 5.9) than epithelioid nonpleomorphic subtype (n = 57, 6.5 ± 3.2, p = 0.050), and were comparable to that of nonepithelioid tumors (n = 12, 9.1 ± 4.8). Among the epithelioid tumors with high SUVmax (n = 12), 50% (n = 6) showed pleomorphic subtype. In contrast, among epithelioid tumors with low SUVmax (n = 54), 6% (n = 3) showed epithelioid pleomorphic subtypes (p = 0.001). A positive correlation between mitotic count and SUVmax was observed (r = 0.30, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS:

Pleomorphic subtype of epithelioid MPM showed higher SUVmax than the epithelioid nonpleomorphic subtype and was similar to nonepithelioid histology. Preoperative SUVmax on FDG-PET in epithelioid MPM can indicate patients with pleomorphic subtype with poor prognosis, supporting their reclassification as nonepithelioid.

No comments:

Post a Comment