Adam L. Booth, Matthew S. Katz, Michael J. Misialek, Timothy Craig Allen, and Lija Joseph (2018) “Please Help Me See the Dragon I Am Slaying”: Implementation of a Novel Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program and Survey of Patient Experience. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine In-Press.
Early Online Release
Adam L. Booth, MD; Matthew S. Katz, MD; Michael J. Misialek, MD; Timothy Craig Allen, MD, JD; Lija Joseph, MD
From the Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (Dr Booth); the Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Dr Joseph) and Radiation Medicine (Dr Katz), Lowell General Hospital, Lowell, Massachusetts; the Department of Pathology, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts (Dr Misialek); and the Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical School, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (Dr Allen).
Context.— Pathologists evaluate human disease and teach medical students, residents, and clinicians. Historically recognized as the “doctor's doctor,” pathologists are well suited to be a direct patient resource of individualized, accurate information.
Objective.— To develop and implement a pathology consultation service whereby patients review their tissue slides directly with the pathologists.
Design.— A pathologist conducted patient consultations, reviewing biopsy or surgery findings on a multiheaded microscope or computer screen. The pathologist evaluated patients' understanding of their disease and invited patients to ask specific questions. We recorded patient demographic data and assessed utilization with a short patient satisfaction survey using 6 questions with a 5-point Likert scale and 2 questions for open response.
Results.— A total of 31 patients came for consultation; 39% (12 of 31) were accompanied by a friend or family member. Patients' median age was 59 years, with a strong female predominance (90%; 28 of 31). The majority of patients had breast cancer (58%; 18 of 31) or hematologic malignancy (19%; 6 of 31). Of the 31 patients, the survey response rate was 58% (18 of 31). Top-box scoring demonstrated program support, with 89% (16 of 18) of respondents strongly recommending the experience to another patient. Additionally, 78% (14 of 18) strongly agreed that they felt more empowered after seeing their disease. Mean scores for Likert-based questions all were higher than 4.0.
Conclusions.— To our knowledge, this study is the first report of direct patient-pathologist consultation. Early data suggest that the program may provide effective patient-specific education. The high response rate and favorable assessment of the program suggest that it may be a valuable resource for some patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment