http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22330669
Clin Dermatol. 2012 Mar;30(2):231-6.
Ethical dilemmas in journal publication.
Babalola O, Grant-Kels JM, Parish LC.
Source
University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Abstract
Physicians often face tremendous pressures and incentives to publish, sometimes leading to a compromise of ethical standards, either consciously or unconsciously. From the vantage of ethical authorship, we discuss what constitutes authorship; avoidance of ghost authorship; plagiarism, as well as self-plagiarism and duplicate publication; falsification; and fabrication. Editors also face ethical challenges, including how best to manage peer-review bias, to address reviewer tardiness, and to locate reviewers with appropriate expertise and professionalism. Editors need to deal with authors who fragment their work into multiple publications to enhance their curriculum vitae ("salami factor"), as well as to manage the financial benefits of advertising and to avoid conflicts of interest for the journal. Both authors and editors should be straightforward and principled throughout the publication process.
No comments:
Post a Comment