Surgery for gastric cancer: "evidence was found for the inverse relationship between hospital volume and postoperative mortality as well as overall survival"

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23054104

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct 9. [Epub ahead of print]

Quality of Care Indicators for the Surgical Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Dikken JL, Stiekema J, van de Velde CJ, Verheij M, Cats A, Wouters MW, van Sandick JW.

Source

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Quality assurance is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial factor for the (surgical) treatment of gastric cancer. The purpose of the current study was to define a minimum set of evidence-based quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS:

A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and May 2011 was performed, using search terms on gastric cancer, treatment, and quality of care. Studies were selected based on predefined selection criteria. Potential quality of care indicators were assessed based on their level of evidence and were grouped into structure, process, and outcome indicators.

RESULTS:

A total of 173 articles were included in the current study. For structural measures, evidence was found for the inverse relationship between hospital volume and postoperative mortality as well as overall survival. Regarding process measures, the most common indicators concerned surgical technique, perioperative care, and multimodality treatment. The only outcome indicator with supporting evidence was a microscopically radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although specific literature on quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer is limited, several quality of care indicators could be identified. These indicators can be used in clinical audits and other quality assurance programs.