http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206669

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Nov 30. pii: S1521-6934(12)00165-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.10.004. [Epub ahead of print]

The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section.

Schifrin BS, Cohen WR.

Source

Providence Tarzana Medical Center Tarzana, CA 91356, USA. Electronic address: bpminc@aol.com.

Abstract

Malpractice fears are believed to influence various aspects of obstetrical practice. They seem to have contributed in small part to the rising primary caesarean section rate, but have also played a considerable role in the downtrend in vaginal birth after caesarean statistics. The rising vaginal birth after caesarean section rate between 1981 and 1995 was interrupted by a spate of lawsuits associated with broadened indications for vaginal birth after caesarean section in conjunction with requirements for immediate clinician availability. These factors dramatically reduced the availability of hospitals and clinicians willing to offer vaginal birth after caesarean section. This reversal, however, has not diminished the demand for vaginal birth after caesarean section from various stakeholders in the name of patient autonomy, clinician beneficence and optimal care. Nevertheless, as long as stringent requirements remain for clinician attendance during vaginal birth after caesarean section, and as long as the spectre of preventable error and the lingering dread of lawsuits retain their hold on obstetrical practice, caesarean section trends are unlikely to change.