Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2013 Aug 4. pii: S1472-9792(13)00142-X. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.07.004. [Epub ahead of print]
A new unifying theory of the pathogenesis of tuberculosis.
Source
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Electronic address: ian.orme@colostate.edu.
Abstract
It is set in stone that Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a facultative intracellular bacterial parasite. This axiom drives our knowledge of the host response, the way we design vaccines against the organism by generating protective T cells, and to a lesser extent, the way we try to target anti-microbial drugs. The purpose of this article is to commit total heresy. I believe that M.tuberculosis can equally well be regarded as an extracellular pathogen and may in fact spend a large percentage of its human lung "life-cycle" in this environment. It is of course intracellular as well, but this may well be little more than a brief interlude after infection of a new host during which the bacterium must replicate to increase its chances of transmission and physiologically adapt prior to moving back to an extracellular phase. As a result, by focusing almost completely on just the intracellular phase, we may be making serious strategic errors in the way we try to intervene in this pathogenic process. It is my opinion that when a TB bacillus enters the lungs and starts to reside inside an alveolar macrophage, its central driving force is to switch on a process leading to lung necrosis, since it is only by this process that the local lung tissue can be destroyed and the bacillus can be exhaled and transmitted. I present here a new model of the pathogenesis of the disease that attempts to unify the pathogenic process of infection, disease, persistence [rather than latency], and reactivation.
No comments:
Post a Comment