http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23345086

J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Jan 24. [Epub ahead of print]

Bioethics and Its Gatekeepers: Does Institutional Racism Exist in Leading Bioethics Journals?

Chattopadhyay S, Myser C, De Vries R.

Source

Department of Physiology and Institutional Ethics Committee, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, 5th Mile, Tadong, Gangtok, Sikkim, 737102, India, linkdrsc@yahoo.com.

Abstract

Who are the gatekeepers in bioethics? Does editorial bias or institutional racism exist in leading bioethics journals? We analyzed the composition of the editorial boards of 14 leading bioethics journals by country. Categorizing these countries according to their Human Development Index (HDI), we discovered that approximately 95 percent of editorial board members are based in (very) high-HDI countries, less than 4 percent are from medium-HDI countries, and fewer than 1.5 percent are from low-HDI countries. Eight out of 14 leading bioethics journals have no editorial board members from a medium- or low-HDI country. Eleven bioethics journals have no board members from low-HDI countries. This severe underrepresentation of bioethics scholars from developing countries on editorial boards suggests that bioethics may be affected by institutional racism, raising significant questions about the ethics of bioethics in a global context.