From Boston College: Whose mind matters more-the agent or the artist? An investigation of ethical and aesthetic evaluations

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24039707

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e70759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070759.

Whose mind matters more-the agent or the artist? An investigation of ethical and aesthetic evaluations.

Hawley-Dolan A, Young L.

Source

Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Abstract

Theory of mind, the capacity for reasoning about mental states such as beliefs and intentions, represents a critical input to ethical and aesthetic evaluations. Did the agent cause harm on purpose? Were those brushstrokes intentional? The current study investigates theory of mind for moral and artistic judgments within the same paradigm. In particular, we target the role of intent for two kinds of judgments: "objective" judgments of quality and "subjective" judgments of preference or liking. First, we show that intent matters more for objective versus subjective judgments in the case of ethicsand aesthetics. Second, we show that, overall, intent matters more for ethical versus aesthetic evaluations. These findings suggest that an "objective-subjective" dimension describes judgments across both domains, and that observers assign more weight to the mind of the moral agent than the mind of the artist when making the relevant evaluations.