Source
Lab Fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University.
Abstract
This
paper advances a social organization approach to examining unethical
behavior. While unethical behaviors may stem in part from failures in
individual
morality
or psychological blind spots, they are both generated and performed
through social interactions among individuals and groups. To illustrate
the value of a social organization approach, a case study of a medical
school professor's first experience with
pharmaceutical-company-sponsored research is provided in order to
examine how funding arrangements can constrain research integrity. The
case illustrates three significant ways that institutional corruption
can occur in the research process. First, conflicts of norms between
pharmaceutical companies, universities, and affiliated teaching
hospitals can result in compromises and self-censorship. Second, normal
behavior is shaped through routine interactions. Unethical behaviors can
be (or can become) normal behaviors when they are produced and
reproduced through a network of social interactions. Third, funding
arrangements can create networks of dependency that structurally distort
the independence of the academic researcher in favor of the funder's
interests. More broadly, the case study demonstrates how the social
organization approach deepens our understanding of the practice of
ethics.
No comments:
Post a Comment