Meat Sci. 2014 Aug 28;99C:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.011. [Epub ahead of print]
Meat morals: relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior.
Author information
- 1Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Sint-Jacobstraat 2, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
- 2Department of Communication Studies, Ghent University, Korte Meer 7-11, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: Liselot.Hudders@Ugent.be.
Abstract
The aim of this work is to explore the relation between morality and diet choice by investigating how animal and human welfare attitudes and donation behaviors can predict a meat eating versus flexitarian versus vegetarian diet. The results of a survey study (N=299) show that animal health concerns (measured by the Animal Attitude Scale) can predict diet choice. Vegetarians are most concerned, while full-time meat eaters are least concerned, and the contrast between flexitarians and vegetarians is greater than the contrast between flexitarians and full-time meat eaters. With regards to human welfare (measured by the Moral Foundations Questionnaire), results show that attitudes towards human suffering set flexitarians apart from vegetarians and attitudes towards authority and respect distinguish between flexitarians and meat eaters. To conclude, results show that vegetarians donate more often to animal oriented charities than flexitarians and meat eaters, while no differences between the three diet groups occur for donations to human oriented charities.
No comments:
Post a Comment